Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

JERRY WAYNE HYDE AND THE MANCHESTER INSURANCE AND INDEMNITY COMPANY, APPELLANTS-PETITIONERS, v. JOYCE S. MAINE, APPELLEE-RESPONDENT.

PER CURIAM.

In this automobile negligence action defendants-appellants seek to appeal a pre-trial order relating to limits of two policies of liability coverage issued by appellant Manchester Insurance and Indemnity Company to defendant-appellant Jerry Wayne Hyde, in which order the trial court "stacked" the limits of each policy. Additionally, in the event the interlocutory appeal has been improvidently taken, appellants have petitioned for common law certiorari to review the same order. Both cases have been consolidated.

This being an action at law, we construe the order appealed from as being a non-appealable interlocutory order. Moreover, concerning the viability of common law certiorari, we think that whether in error or not the trial court did not depart from the essential requirements of law in entering the order nor, if entered erroneously, did appellants suffer irrevocable injury therefrom.

Rule 4.2, F.A.R.

In view whereof, the interlocutory appeal herein should be, and it is hereby, dismissed. Additionally, the petition and prayer for common law certiorari is denied.

McNULTY, C.J., and BOARDMAN and SCHEB, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

HYDE v. MAINE
(Dec 23, 1975)