AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

MALCOLM MEYER et al., as Trustees, Respondents, v. PARR COMPANY OF SUFFOLK, INC., Appellant, et al., Defendants. MALCOLM MEYER et al., as Trustees, Respondents,

In two actions to foreclose separate mortgages on real property, in each of which an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, was made appointing a referee to compute the amount due plaintiffs, upon defendants' default in answering, defendants the Parr Company of Suffolk, Inc., and Suffolk Meadows Enterprises, Inc., appeal from separate orders (one in each action) of the same court, both entered October 2, 1975, which, inter alia, denied their respective motions to open their defaults. Orders affirmed, without costs. In our view, appellants failed to meet their burden of establishing excusable neglect and the existence of a meritorious defense. Consequently, Special Term did not abuse its discretion in denying the motions. Rabin, Acting P.J., Latham, Cohalan, Brennan and Munder, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MEYER v. PARR COMPANY OF SUFFOLK, INC
(Dec 31, 1975)