Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

NUTRITIONAL ADDITIVES CORPORATION, A NEVADA CORPORATION, AND W. GLENN SEXTON, APPELLANTS, v. MIN-AD, INC., A COLORADO CORPORATION, RESPONDENT.

OPINION

Per Curiam:

The district court having on June 18, 1975, entered a preliminary injunction without requiring a bond, as contemplated by NRCP 65; and

The respondent having conceded that the district court's action was, therefore, erroneous, cf. State ex rel. Friedman v. Dist. Ct., 81 Nev. 131, 399 P.2d 632 (1965);

It is hereby ordered that the district court order granting the preliminary injunction is reversed.

Remittitur shall issue forthwith.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

NUTRITIONAL ADDITIVES v. MIN-AD, INC
(Jan 6, 1976)