Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

ANDREW F. DEIBEL another v. ROBERT E. YORKE another

1. The Superior Court had power to remand the case to the board of appeals (board) for further findings and a statement of the board's reasons for granting the variance. Roberts-Haverhill Associates v. City Council of Haverhill, 2 Mass. App. Ct. 715, 717-719 (1974). O'Brian v. Board of Appeals of Brockton, 3 Mass. App. Ct. 740 (1975). 2. The board was not required to take the further action directed within either of the appeal periods set out in G.L.c. 40A, § 21 (as in effect prior to St. 1973, c. 1114, § 4). The board could and did take its further action within a reasonable time. 3. Nothing in G.L.c. 40A, § 17 (as amended through St. 1973, c. 296, § 2) or § 18 (as amended through St. 1971, c. 1018), required the board to hold a further public hearing in order to consider the evidence taken at the first hearing or make further findings based on that evidence. Selectmen of Kingston v. Board of Appeals of Kingston, 3 Mass. App. Ct. 704 (1975). The judgment entered on August 23, 1974, is affirmed with double costs from September 23, 1974.

So ordered.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

DEIBEL v. YORKE
(Jan 22, 1976)