Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

MACKEL et al. v. SHERATON BILTMORE HOTEL et al.

WEBB, Judge.

This is an appeal from the grant of summary judgment to defendants in a premises liability case. For reasons alluded to in Peachtree Bottle Shop v. Bessemer Securities Corp., 134 Ga. App. 729 ( 215 S.E.2d 692), it is sufficient to state upon this review that defendants have failed to carry their burden of demonstrating, under applicable summary judgment standards, that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that they are entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Our ruling here, however, does not necessarily mean that plaintiffs are entitled to finally prevail ( Ray v. Webster, 128 Ga. App. 217 ( 196 S.E.2d 175)), nor does it fix the law of the case. Grantham Transfer Co. v. Hawes, 225 Ga. 436 (1) ( 169 S.E.2d 290); Venable v. Grage, 116 Ga. App. 340 (1) ( 157 S.E.2d 519); E. Raymond Smith, Inc. v. Allstate Ins. Co., 127 Ga. App. 571, 572 (1) ( 194 S.E.2d 339).

Judgment reversed. Deen, P. J., and Quillian, J., concur.

ARGUED JANUARY 14, 1976 — DECIDED JANUARY 30, 1976.
Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MACKEL v. SHERATON BILTMORE HOTEL
(Jan 30, 1976)