Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

HORNE v. HORNE.

INGRAM, Justice.

This is a child custody case from the Superior Court of Colquitt County. These parties were divorced in 1974. At that time the father was awarded custody of their son, who was then three years of age, and the mother was granted visitation rights with the child. The present case involves an action brought by the mother against the father for a change in custody based on her contention that there has been a change in circumstances materially affecting the welfare of the child since the divorce decree. The trial court conducted an evidentiary hearing and entered an order, with findings of fact and conclusions of law, denying a change in custody. The mother disagrees with the trial court's determination of the case and seeks to reverse its judgment in this appeal.

We affirm the trial court. A number of witnesses testified in the trial court and it has broad discretion in resolving disputes of this kind. Our function on appeal is not to make an independent judgment about the custody of the child but only to determine if there is any reasonable evidence in the trial transcript to support the decision of the trial court. There is reasonable evidence to support the judgment of the trial court and, consequently, we cannot hold the trial judge abused his discretion in this case. See Dyar v. Stovall, 230 Ga. 653 ( 198 S.E.2d 679) (1973), and Robinson v. Ashmore, 232 Ga. 498 ( 207 S.E.2d 484) (1974).

Judgment affirmed. All the Justices concur.

SUBMITTED JANUARY 29, 1976 — DECIDED FEBRUARY 11, 1976.
Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

HORNE v. HORNE
(Feb 11, 1976)