Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

STATE OF MISSOURI, RESPONDENT, v. NORMAN W. CURRY, APPELLANT.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant's single point is, "The court erred in failing to sustain defendant's challenge for cause of the venireman Hale." This utterly fails to comply with Rule 84.04(d) [made applicable to criminal cases by Rule 28.18] in that there is no statement as to wherein and why the ruling of the court is claimed to be erroneous. Counsel should note the relevant remarks of Simeone, J., in L. L. v. V. F. L. and M. D. S., Inc., [Missouri Court of Appeals, St. Louis District, No. 37,061, decided January 20, 1976], relating to dismissal for improper briefing.

The appeal is dismissed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

STATE v. CURRY
(Feb 9, 1976)