AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

LOUIS J. FRANK et al., Appellants, v. ROBERT I. COE et al., Respondents.

In an action to recover damages for abuse of process, plaintiffs appeal from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated July 28, 1975, which granted defendants' motion to dismiss the complaint and (2) a decision of the same court, dated July 25, 1975, upon which the order was made. Appeal from the decision dismissed, without costs or disbursements. No appeal lies from a decision. Order affirmed, without costs or disbursements. "`The gist of the action for abuse of process lies in the improper use of process after it is issued'" (Hauser v Bartow, 273 N.Y. 370, 373). Plaintiffs are in effect complaining of the institution of an action against them and not of any wrong committed in the execution of process during the course of that suit (see Miller v Stern, 262 App. Div. 5, 8). Hopkins, Acting P.J., Cohalan, Damiani, Christ and Titone, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

FRANK v. COE
(Mar 8, 1976)