AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

CENVEN, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. BETHLEHEM STEEL CORPORATION et al., Defendants. BETHLEHEM STEEL CORPORATION, Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant, YOUNGSTOWN CARTAGE COMPANY, Third-Party Defendant-Respondent.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, entered April 16, 1975 insofar as it dismissed the third-party complaint of third-party plaintiff Bethlehem Steel Corporation against third-party defendant Youngstown Cartage Company, reversed, on the law and the facts, and judgment directed in favor of said third-party plaintiff against third-party defendant. Appellant shall recover of respondent $60 costs and disbursements of this appeal. The operation of raising the steel beams from third-party defendant's truck to the place of storage on the 28th floor of the building under construction constitutes "loading and unloading" as defined in Wagman v American Fid. Cas. Co., 304 N.Y. 490; and Lamberti v Anaco Equip. Corp., 16 A.D.2d 121), and is thus covered by the indemnity agreement. The indemnity agreement was not invalid under section 5-323 Gen. Oblig. of the General Obligations Law. (Fuller Co. v Fischbach Moore, 7 A.D.2d 33, 34.) Section 5-322.1 Gen. Oblig. of the General Obligations Law effective in August, 1975 is inapplicable.

Concur — Murphy, J.P., Lupiano, Burns and Silverman, JJ.; Nunez, J., would affirm for the reasons stated by Whitman, J. Settle order on notice.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

CENVEN, INC. v. BETHLEHEM STEEL CORPORATION
(Mar 25, 1976)