AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

JOSEPH VALENTINO et al., Plaintiffs, v. JOHN H. THOMPSON et al., Defendants. (And a Second Title.) JOSEPH KABAN, Appellant,

In personal injury actions, plaintiffs Kaban appeal from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated April 16, 1975, which granted the motion of third-party defendant Manhattan Boiler and Equipment Corporation to resettle a judgment so as to delete therefrom two provisions for a money judgment in favor of the third-party plaintiffs against the third-party defendants and to substitute therefor provisions awarding judgment to the third-party plaintiffs against the third-party defendants upon payment to the plaintiffs upon the principal judgment; the order further provides that the third-party judgment shall be in such amount as the amount paid on the principal judgment shall exceed the third-party plaintiffs' proportional share (75%) of the principal judgment, and (2) so much of the amended judgment of the same court, entered May 16, 1975, as effectuated the said order. Order affirmed and amended judgment affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements (see Klinger v Dudley, 49 A.D.2d 693; Adams v Lindsay, 77 Misc.2d 824). We note an apparent attempt in the brief submitted on behalf of John H. Thompson to appeal from portions of the order and judgment under review. Such purported appeal has not been perfected in accordance with the rules of this court. Cohalan, Acting P.J., Margett, Damiani, Rabin and Titone, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

VALENTINO v. THOMPSON
(Apr 12, 1976)