Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

CITIZENS SOUTHERN NATIONAL BANK v. PLOTT.

GUNTER, Justice.

This case is here by our granting an application for a writ of certiorari to review the decision and judgment of the Court of Appeals in Citizens Southern Nat. Bank v. Plott, 135 Ga. App. 778 ( 218 S.E.2d 901) (1975).

Although the Court of Appeals ruled on two issues in the case, the primary and controlling issue is the constitutionality or unconstitutionality of Georgia's statutory garnishment procedures in cases where the debtor is a judgment-debtor. The Court of Appeals held that post-judgment garnishment proceedings pursuant to Georgia's statutory scheme, under the statutes in effect prior to July 1, 1975, were not violative of procedural due process of law. It held that this court's decision in North Georgia Finishing, Inc. v. Di-Chem, Inc., 233 Ga. 793 ( 214 S.E.2d 667) (1975), was applicable only to pre-judgment garnishment proceedings as distinguished from post-judgment garnishment proceedings. After the rendition of our decision, which was mandated by the decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in North Georgia Finishing, Inc. v. Di-Chem, Inc., 419 U.S. 601 (1975), the 1975 Georgia General Assembly amended Code Title 46 relating to garnishment, and the new garnishment procedures became effective July 1, 1975. Ga. L. 1975, p. 1291 et seq. However, the instant case is controlled by the statutes in effect prior to July 1, 1975.

We have today ruled that our garnishment procedure as it existed prior to July 1, 1975, was unconstitutional with respect to post-judgment garnishment cases as well as pre-judgment garnishment cases. See Coursin v. Harper, 236 Ga. 729.

It therefore follows that the decision of the Court of Appeals on this issue was erroneous, and having reached this conclusion on the constitutional issue, it is unnecessary to rule on the second issue decided by the Court of Appeals. The judgment must be reversed.

Judgment reversed. All the Justices concur, except Hall, J., who dissents and Nichols, C. J., who is disqualified.

ARGUED MARCH 9, 1976 — DECIDED APRIL 28, 1976 — REHEARING DENIED MAY 17, 1976.

HALL, Justice, dissenting.

I dissent for the reasons stated in my dissent in Coursin v. Harper, 236 Ga. 729.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

CITIZENS SOUTHERN NATIONAL BANK v. PLOTT
(Apr 28, 1976)