Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

ANTHONY IAFELICE AND F. WILLIAM KOESTNER, A PARTNERSHIP TRADING AS K I LAUNDROMAT, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. CITY OF PASSAIC, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION IN THE COUNTY OF PASSAIC, NEW JERSEY, AND RENT LEVELING BOARD OF THE CITY OF PASSAIC, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the Law Division is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed by Judge Schwartz in his written opinion reported in Gardens v. City of Passaic, 130 N.J. Super. 369 (Law Div. 1974). See Hutton Pk. Gardens ( Hutton Lafayette Apts. Co.) v. Town Council of Town of West Orange, 68 N.J. 543 (1975); Brunetti v. New Milford, 68 N.J. 576 (1975), and Troy Hills Village v. Parsippany-Troy Hills Tp. Council, 68 N.J. 604 (1975).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

IAFELICE v. CITY OF PASSAIC
(May 18, 1976)