AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

JAMES A. GELLER, Respondent, v. ALFRED JULIEN et al., Defendants, and ELLIAS C. HOPPENFELD, Appellant.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered January 14, 1976, denying the defendant-appellant Hoppenfeld's motion for an order striking the action from the Jury Calendar, unanimously reversed, on the law, and the motion granted, without costs and without disbursements. This court has previously designated trial counsel Alfred Julien as stakeholder of one third of the counsel fee derived from litigation against the City of New York, which was settled for the sum of $500,000. (Geller v Julien, 50 A.D.2d 747. ) The defendant-appellant Hoppenfeld was the attorney originally retained in the matter, and the controversy is between him and the plaintiff Geller who has a claim in quantum meruit against said defendant-appellant for any work he may have done in the case at the request of the defendant-appellant. There being a joinder of claims for equitable and legal relief, a jury trial must be considered waived. (Paterno Sons v Town of New Windsor, 43 A.D.2d 863; Epstein v Paganne, Ltd., 39 A.D.2d 855.)

Concur — Stevens, P.J., Kupferman, Lupiano, Lane and Lynch, JJ.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

GELLER v. JULIEN
(May 18, 1976)