Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

ROBERT LEVITAN SONS, INC., Appellant-Respondent, v. CHRISTINE FRANCIS, Respondent-Appellant

MEMORANDUM. Judgment affirmed without costs.

In this action for goods sold and delivered, defendant counterclaimed for damages based upon the Truth-in-Lending Act (US Code, tit 15, § 1601 et seq.; see, also, 12 CFR Part 226) and articles 10 and 10A of the Personal Property Law. The dismissal of plaintiff's complaint and the award of damages to defendant were entirely proper. The failure to date the contract was a violation of both the Federal and State statutes entitling defendant to a recovery of twice the finance charge (see US Code, tit 15, § 1638, subd [a], par [8]; 12 C.F.R. § 226.8 [b] [1], [3]; Personal Property Law, § 402, subd [3]). Moreover, the failure to give defendant notice of her right of cancellation warranted an award of $100 and reasonable attorney's fee (Personal Property Law, §§ 428; 429, subd [3]), even though the counterclaim failed to demand that relief specifically (CPLR 3017, subd [a]). The award of attorney's fees to a publicly funded legal service office was proper under the circumstances (Jones v Seldon's Furniture Warehouse, 357 F. Supp. 886; Doggett v Ritter Finance Co. of Louisa, 384 F. Supp. 150, 158).

Concur: SCHWARTZWALD, P.J., RINALDI and O'CONNOR, JJ.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

LEVITAN SONS v. FRANCIS
(May 25, 1976)