Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

LANG, FISHER STASHOWER ADVERTISING, INC., APPELLANT. v. COLLINS, TAX COMMR., APPELLEE.

Taxation — Sales and use taxes — 60-day letter — Not an appealable order.

Per Curiam.

The "60-day letter" or notice of intent to levy an assessment is not a final determination that Lang, Fisher Stashower Advertising, Inc., is a vendor. Of course, the notice reflects the view held by the Tax Commissioner at that time that appellant was a vendor. However, the notice is not a final determination by the commissioner. Until such time as the commissioner makes a final determination, the initial determination expressed in the notice is subject to modification or review by him.

Since the notice is not a final determination by the Tax Commissioner, the Board of Tax Appeals correctly found that it was without jurisdiction to consider the appeal. R.C. 5717.02; Michelin Tire Corp. v. Kosydar (1974), 38 Ohio St.2d 254, 313 N.E.2d 394.

For the foregoing reason, the decision of the Board of Tax Appeals is affirmed.

Decision affirmed.

O'NEILL, C.J., HERBERT, CORRIGAN, STERN, CELEBREZZE, W. BROWN and P. BROWN, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

LANG, FISHER STASHOWER ADVERTISING v. COLLINS
(May 26, 1976)