Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

STATE, Respondent, v. KLINE, Appellant. Motion for rehearing denied, without costs, on October 19, 1976.

PER CURIAM.

The court is equally divided on the question of whether the judgment should be affirmed or reversed, Mr. Chief Justice BEILFUSS, Mr. Justice HEFFERNAN, and Mr. Justice DAY being of the opinion that the judgment should be reversed, and Mr. Justice HANLEY, Mr. Justice CONNOR T. HANSEN, and Mr. Justice ROBERT W. HANSEN being of the opinion that the judgment should be affirmed. The judgment appealed from is affirmed under the rule.

Judgment affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

STATE v. KLINE
(Jun 30, 1976)