NICHOLS, Chief Justice.
Under the decision in Knox v. Knox, 225 Ga. 481 ( 169 S.E.2d 805) (1969); Potts v. Potts, 229 Ga. 827 ( 194 S.E.2d 471) (1972); and White v. White, 233 Ga. 289 ( 210 S.E.2d 817) (1974), a substantial decrease in the husband's income or financial status since the date of the divorce decree may warrant a decrease of alimony and child support payments but does not demand it.
The judgment of the trial court refusing to modify the alimony and child support payments was not error.
Judgment affirmed. All the Justices concur.
NICHOLS, Chief Justice.
SUBMITTED JULY 2, 1976 — DECIDED JULY 15, 1976.