Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

In the Matter of WILLIAMS GEIGER, Respondent, v. EDELMAN, BERGER, PETERS KOSHEL, P.C., et al., Appellants.

Motion granted and appeal dismissed, with costs and $20 costs of motion, upon the grounds that (1) the order appealed from does not substantially modify the order of Supreme Court entered March 17, 1976 within the meaning of CPLR 5601 (subd [a], par [iii]); (2) appellant is not aggrieved by the Appellate Division modification of the order of Supreme Court entered March 19, 1976 (CPLR 5601, subd [a], par [iii]); and (3) that portion of the order appealed from which dismissed an appeal from an order of Supreme Court entered March 25, 1976, denying a motion for reargument and/or reconsideration, involves a question of discretion of the type not reviewable by the Court of Appeals (see Cohen and Karger, Powers of the New York Court of Appeals, § 147, p 585).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MATTER OF GEIGER v. BERGER
(Jul 13, 1976)