Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

In the Matter of MARTIN TAYLOR, Appellant, v. EVERETT F. McNAB et al., Constituting the Board of Elections of Suffolk County, and ROSE CARACAPPA, Respondent.

Per Curiam.

Having granted leave to appeal in this case in the accelerated procedure required in some election cases the court sua sponte has reconsidered such determination and on such reconsideration recalls its prior determination and denies the application for leave to appeal.

It now appears that the record in this case is insufficient to permit an informed judicial resolution of the important issues tendered for determination. Further, in view of the practical constraints of time before the primary elections on September 14, 1976, the court is satisfied that there can be no adequate opportunity appropriately to supplement the record and to obtain a final judicial disposition.

Chief Judge BREITEL and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and COOKE concur in Per Curiam opinion.

On reconsideration, order granting leave to appeal recalled and motion for leave to appeal denied.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MATTER OF TAYLOR v. McNAB
(Sep 2, 1976)