Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

In the Matter of MARY E. CANE, Appellant, v. EDWARD J. MAHONEY et al., Constituting the Erie County Board of Elections, Respondents, and ROBERT M. JORDAN, Respondent.

Order affirmed, without costs. It does not appear that petitioner was a member of the Democratic Party, nor does she assert that she was entitled to the authorization of that party for designation as its candidate. In this circumstance petitioner lacks standing to raise any issue as to whether the filing of the Democratic Party's certificate of authorization conformed to the provisions of subdivision 4 of section 137 of the Election Law (Matter of Wydler v Cristenfeld, 35 N.Y.2d 719). It is of no consequence for present purposes that this proceeding was instituted under CPLR article 78 rather than pursuant to section 330 of the Election Law.

Concur: Chief Judge BREITEL and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and COOKE.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MATTER OF CANE v. MAHONEY
(Sep 2, 1976)