Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

VICKERY v. VICKERY.

INGRAM, Justice.

This is an appeal by a husband from an order granted in Bibb Superior Court which set aside an earlier divorce decree in that court. The husband obtained the divorce and four months later the wife filed proceedings under Code Ann. § 81A-160 to set aside the decree for failure of the husband to perfect service upon her as a nonresident in the case. However, it is undisputed that subsequent to the grant of the divorce decree the wife remarried through a ceremonial marriage to a third party.

The husband enumerates a number of errors in the trial court relating to the judgment setting aside the earlier divorce decree. We believe it is necessary to reach only one of them. Enumeration of error No. 6 asserts that the trial court erred in setting aside the divorce decree because the wife's remarriage estops her from attacking the decree. This enumeration has merit.

It is generally recognized that a party litigant who accepts benefits under a divorce decree is estopped to set it aside. See, e.g., Thompson v. Thompson, 203 Ga. 128 (2 b) ( 45 S.E.2d 632) (1947); Burnham v. Burnham, 215 Ga. 57 ( 108 S.E.2d 706) (1959); Clark, Law of Domestic Relations, Divorce and Alimony, § 11.3; and 12 ALR2d 153, Anno.: Vacating or Setting Aside Divorce Decree after Remarriage, § 8.

Judgment reversed. All the Justices concur.

INGRAM, Justice.

SUBMITTED SEPTEMBER 13, 1976 — DECIDED OCTOBER 5, 1976.
Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

VICKERY v. VICKERY
(Oct 5, 1976)