STEVLEE FACTORS, INC. v. STATE, N.J. Super. App. Div., Judgment, Law, casemine.com

Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Report a problem

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Attorney(S)

Mr. Barnett Berr argued the cause for appellant. Mr. Richard R. Width argued the cause for respondent United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company ( Messrs. Lindabury, McCormick Estabrook, attorneys). Mr. Dennis J. Drasco argued the cause for respondent Reliance Insurance Company ( Messrs. Lum, Biunno Tompkins, attorneys). A statement in lieu of brief was filed on behalf of the State of New Jersey by Mr. Peter D. Pizzuto, Deputy Attorney General ( Mr. William F. Hyland, Attorney General, attorney).

Judges

PER CURIAM.

Are you a practicing lawyer?

Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.

Upload pleading to use the new AI search

Click here to upload

Cites

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Attorney(S)

Mr. Barnett Berr argued the cause for appellant. Mr. Richard R. Width argued the cause for respondent United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company ( Messrs. Lindabury, McCormick Estabrook, attorneys). Mr. Dennis J. Drasco argued the cause for respondent Reliance Insurance Company ( Messrs. Lum, Biunno Tompkins, attorneys). A statement in lieu of brief was filed on behalf of the State of New Jersey by Mr. Peter D. Pizzuto, Deputy Attorney General ( Mr. William F. Hyland, Attorney General, attorney).

Judges

PER CURIAM.

See more information ...

Smart Summary

Please sign up to generate summary.

STEVLEE FACTORS, INC., A CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, UNITED STATES FIDELITY AND GUARANTY COMPANY AND RELIANCE INSURANCE COMPANY, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the judgment of the Chancery Division substantially for the reasons expressed by Judge Ciolino in his opinion which is reported at 136 N.J. Super. 461.

It should be emphasized that the surety in each case under the terms of its obligation was only bound to pay those amounts in excess of the contract price which the State was required to pay as a result of Dean's defaults. The retainage held by the State in each instance was part of the contract price.

Affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

STEVLEE FACTORS, INC. v. STATE

STEVLEE FACTORS, INC., A CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, UNITED STATES FIDELITY AND GUARANTY COMPANY AND RELIANCE INSURANCE COMPANY, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Comments