Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

ROBERT EARL BARRINGTON, SR., APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant seeks review of his conviction of the crime of sexual battery (F.S. 794.011(4)(a)) and his resulting sentence of life imprisonment. Our examination of the record reveals that the evidence was sufficient, if believed by the jury, (which apparently it was) to sustain the conviction. (See McKee v. State, Sup.Ct.Fla. 1947, 159 Fla. 794, 33 So.2d 50; Truluck v. State, Sup.Ct. Fla. 1959, 108 So.2d 748; Thomas v. State, Sup.Ct.Fla. 1964, 167 So.2d 309 and Tibbs v. State, Sup.Ct.Fla. 1976, 337 So.2d 788, opinion filed July 28, 1976. However, the state candidly agrees that the sentence imposed exceeds that permitted by law. (See F.S. 794.011(4)(e) and F.S. 775.082, Florida Statutes 1973). Accordingly, we affirm the conviction but reverse and remand for the purpose of the trial judge correcting the sentence. It shall not be necessary for appellant to be present at the time the sentence is corrected.

Affirmed in part and reversed in part.

BOYER, C.J., and RAWLS and McCORD, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

BARRINGTON v. STATE
(Oct 13, 1976)