Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

HOWARD TABANKIN, Appellant, v. MICHAEL CODD, as Police Commissioner of the City of New York, Respondent.

Appeal dismissed, with costs. Since the constitutional issues on the basis of which this appeal is taken are but a restatement of questions whose merit has been clearly adjudicated against appellant's position (e.g., United States v Miller, 307 U.S. 174; Presser v Illinois, 116 U.S. 252, 265; United States v Cruikshank, 92 U.S. 542, 553; Matter of Moore v Gallup, 267 App. Div. 64, 67, affd 293 N.Y. 846; Burton v Sills, 53 N.J. 86, app dsmd 394 U.S. 812; United States v Karnes, 437 F.2d 284, cert den 402 U.S. 1008), they must be held to lack the requisite substantiality to sustain this appeal as of right under CPLR 5601 (subd b, par 1) (People ex rel. Uviller v Luger, 38 N.Y.2d 854). Accordingly, it must be dismissed (Cohen and Karger, Powers of the New York Court of Appeals, § 55, p 254).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

HOWARD TABANKIN v. CODD
(Oct 19, 1976)