STATE v. SAPP, N.J., Judgment, Law, casemine.com

Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Report a problem

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Attorney(S)

Mr. Philip Elberg, Designated Counsel, argued the cause for appellant ( Mr. Stanley C. Van Ness, Public Defender, attorney). Mr. William F. Bolan, Jr., Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent ( Mr. William F. Hyland, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney; Ms. Barbara Ann Villano, Deputy Attorney General, of counsel and on the brief).

Judges

Are you a practicing lawyer?

Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.

Upload pleading to use the new AI search

Click here to upload

Cites

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Attorney(S)

Mr. Philip Elberg, Designated Counsel, argued the cause for appellant ( Mr. Stanley C. Van Ness, Public Defender, attorney). Mr. William F. Bolan, Jr., Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent ( Mr. William F. Hyland, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney; Ms. Barbara Ann Villano, Deputy Attorney General, of counsel and on the brief).

Judges

See more information ...

Smart Summary

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. WILLIAM SAPP,DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is reversed substantially for the reasons expressed by Judge Morgan in her dissenting opinion. 144 N.J. Super. 455 at 460.

Three members of the Court would affirm substantially for the reasons expressed in the majority opinion of the Appellate Division.

For reversal — Chief Justice HUGHES, Justices PASHMAN and CLIFFORD and Judge CONFORD — 4.

For affirmance — Justices MOUNTAIN, SULLIVAN and SCHREIBER — 3.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.