Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

MADSEN v. MEMORIAL SALES OF GEORGIA, INC. et al.

BELL, Chief Judge.

This is a post-judgment garnishment proceeding which was instituted prior to July 1, 1975. The Supreme Court in Coursin v. Harper, 236 Ga. 729 ( 225 S.E.2d 428) held that Georgia's garnishment statutes in existence prior to July 1, 1975 were unconstitutional in pre as well as post-judgment garnishment cases. We must therefore hold the instant garnishment proceeding void and of no effect. Rose, Silverman Hunt v. Ben O'Callaghan Co., 134 Ga. App. 648 ( 215 S.E.2d 515). The judgment for the garnishee is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed. Clark and Stolz, JJ., concur.

ARGUED SEPTEMBER 21, 1976 — DECIDED OCTOBER 25, 1976.
Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MADSEN v. MEMORIAL SALES OF GEORGIA, INC
(Oct 25, 1976)