Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

DAVIS v. EMBRY et al.

BELL, Chief Judge.

This foreclosure on personalty suit was tried by the court. In entering judgment for plaintiff, the court failed to make findings of fact and conclusions of law as required by CPA § 52 (a) (Code Ann. § 81A-152 (a)). Accordingly, the appeal is remanded to the trial court with direction that it vacate the judgment, prepare, or cause to be prepared, appropriate findings of fact and conclusions of law, and enter a new judgment after which the losing party shall be free to enter another appeal if he should desire. Spivey v. Mayson, 124 Ga. App. 775 ( 186 S.E.2d 154).

Appeal remanded with direction. Clark and Stolz, JJ., concur.

ARGUED SEPTEMBER 22, 1976 — DECIDED OCTOBER 25, 1976.
Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

DAVIS v. EMBRY
(Oct 25, 1976)