Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

IN RE LARKINS.

Habeas corpus — Mentally ill — Commitment — Habeas corpus petition dismissed, when — Allegations not supported.

Per Curiam.

Appellant's amended petition for a writ of habeas corpus seeks release on the ground of a claimed denial of due process because of the alleged inadequate representation by counsel at the time of appellant's commitment.

There is nothing in the record of this habeas corpus proceeding before the Court of Appeals to support the claims made by appellant.

The judgment of the Court of Appeals dismissing appellant's amended petition in habeas corpus is, accordingly, affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

O'NEILL, C.J., HERBERT, CORRIGAN, STERN, CELEBREZZE, W. BROWN and P. BROWN, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

IN RE LARKINS
(Oct 27, 1976)