Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

In the Matter of G. DAVID DE BRUIN, Respondent, v. MARY R. McGEE, Appellant, and EVERETT F. McNAB et al., Constituting the Board of Elections of the County of Suffolk, Respondents. (And Two Other Proceedings.)

MEMORANDUM. The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

The record discloses that there were 1,617 signatures on the designating petition; 1,500 were required under the statute. It was stipulated at Special Term that 77 signatures were invalid. We conclude that another 150 signatures must be invalidated for omission or error with respect to the election district of subscribing witnesses (cf. Matter of Rutter v Coveney, 38 N.Y.2d 993). There accordingly were insufficient signatures to validate the petition. We neither reach nor consider the other issues tendered (see Matter of White v McNab, 40 N.Y.2d 912, decided herewith).

Chief Judge BREITEL and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and COOKE concur.

Order affirmed, without costs, in a memorandum.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MATTER OF DAVID DE BRUIN v. McGEE
(Oct 27, 1976)