Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

NATIONAL ZINC COMPANY, INC., AND THE STATE INSURANCE FUND, PETITIONERS, v. JOHN SPENCER, AND THE STATE INDUSTRIAL COURT, RESPONDENTS.

WILLIAMS, Chief Justice.

This is an original proceeding to review an order of the Industrial Court, affirmed en banc, awarding claimant compensation for 55 per cent permanent partial disability to the body as a whole, suffered because of long exposure to inhalation of smoke, fumes, dust and gases during his twenty-six years employment with petitioner. The long period of exposure irritated, aggravated and accelerated claimant's condition of pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema.

The sole error claimed by petitioner is that award is contrary to evidence and law and not sustained by competent evidence because court failed to appoint an independent medical examiner to examine claimant.

Claimant submitted the report and deposition of Dr. B., who was of the opinion claimant was 80 per cent permanently disabled. Petitioner submitted report and testimony of Dr. M., who found claimant had no disability for ordinary manual labor. Petitioner submits this discrepancy requires the court to appoint an independent medical examiner and his refusal to do so was an abuse of discretion. Petitioner cites no authority for this contention.

We find record supports existence of competent evidence to support finding claimant sustained a 55 per cent disability during course of covered employment. Where medical evidence is conflicting as to extent of disability sustained by claimant, amount of disability is a question of fact for the Industrial Court and will not be disturbed in a proceeding for review where reasonably supported by medical evidence.

Dolese Bros. Co. v. McBride, 268 P.2d 268 (Okla. 1954).

We find court did not abuse its discretion in not appointing an independent medical examiner.

AWARD SUSTAINED.

DAVISON, BERRY, LAVENDER and SIMMS, JJ., concur.

HODGES, V.C.J., and IRWIN, BARNES and DOOLIN, JJ., dissent.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

NATIONAL ZINC CO., INC. v. SPENCER
(Nov 23, 1976)