AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

MASTIC FUEL SERVICE, INC., Respondent, v. DONALD F. VAN COOK et al., Indi

In an action to recover damages predicated upon the unlawful use of execution and malicious prosecution, defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated June 8, 1976, which denied their motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a cause of action. Order affirmed, without costs or disbursements. Plaintiff's complaint sufficiently established a cause of action for malicious prosecution and abuse of process. The defendants were given notice of the transactions to be proved and of the material elements of each cause of action (see CPLR 3013). Attorneys' fees are recoverable as a measure of damages in tort actions where malice is an element of the tort (see 13 N.Y. Jur, Damages, § 145). Hopkins, Acting P.J., Cohalan, Shapiro and Suozzi, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MASTIC FUEL SERVICE, INC. v. COOK
(Dec 6, 1976)