Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

In the Matter of MARGARETHA HOPPL, Respondent, v. CHARLES H. HOPPL, Appellant.

Order affirmed, with costs, on the ground that, upon this record and the reasons assigned by the Appellate Division, the court does not find any abuse of discretion as a matter of law. Question certified answered in the affirmative.

Concur: Chief Judge BREITEL and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and COOKE.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MATTER OF HOPPL v. HOPPL
(Dec 16, 1976)