Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

MR. JOSEPH P. KRIEG v. JACK SCIORTINO.

ON MOTION TO DISMISS

[3] PER CURIAM.

This matter comes before us by reason of motions to dismiss filed in behalf of plaintiff-appellee.

An examination of the record indicates that defendant-appellant did not file a verification of his answer until three days after filing the bond as security for the appeal. Thus, there was no verification in the record which is properly before us on appeal, and there has been no timely compliance with the oath requirement of C.C.P. Article 4735 (see Alexander v. Williams, La.App., 205 So.2d 456), and the suspensive appeal must be dismissed at appellant's cost. It is so ordered.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

[8] PER CURIAM.

In response to the application for rehearing filed in behalf of appellant, we amend our order of January 6, 1977, so as to dismiss the suspensive appeal, but we maintain the appeal as devolutive inasmuch as the order of appeal and the bond were filed in time sufficient to preserve appellant's right to devolutively appeal. In all other respects, the application for rehearing is denied.

ORIGINAL ORDER AMENDED; REHEARING DENIED.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

KRIEG v. SCIORTINO
(Jan 12, 1977)