Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

In the Matter of A., a Minor Child. STATE ex rel JUVENILE DEPARTMENT OF MULTNOMAH COUNTY, Respondent, v. A., a Minor Child, Appellant.

Affirmed as modified.

RICHARDSON, J.

RICHARDSON, J.

This is an appeal from an order of the juvenile court finding the minor child was within the jurisdiction of the court by having committed acts which if committed by an adult would be burglary in the second degree. ORS 164.215.

The juvenile challenges the finding of the court for lack of sufficient evidence to establish burglary beyond a reasonable doubt. We review de novo. State ex rel Juv. Dept. v. Slack, 17 Or. App. 57, 520 P.2d 905 (1974).

There is essentially no conflict in the proof. The juvenile offered no evidence. It is unnecessary to recite the evidence. Suffice it to say we are satisfied beyond a reasonable doubt the juvenile committed the acts of trespass in the second degree, a lesser included offense, but not burglary. This finding is sufficient to bring him within the jurisdiction of the juvenile court. We agree with the court's disposition.

Affirmed as modified.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

STATE EX REL JUV. DEPT. v. A
(Jan 10, 1977)