AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

In the Matter of ANTHONY SINICROPI, Respondent, v. STATE FARM INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant.

In a proceeding to stay arbitration of petitioner's claim under the uninsured motorist provisions of his policy, the State Farm Insurance Company appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated July 20, 1976, which denied the application. Order affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements. The appellant claimed that it was entitled to set off against any uninsured motorist award, the nofault benefits which it had paid and, since it had paid more than the limit of its liability under the uninsured motorist coverage, there was no need for arbitration. The appellant is not entitled to set off those benefits. The nofault benefits are for basic economic loss and the uninsured motorist coverage is for pain and suffering and other expenses incurred which are not compensable by no-fault benefits. Neither the Insurance Law nor the insurance policy allows the insurer to set off those benefits. To the extent that the Insurance Department's regulations are inconsistent (see 11 NYCRR 65.6 [Q]), they are not valid (see Matter of Adams [Government Employees Ins. Co.], 52 A.D.2d 118). Cohalan, Acting P.J., Margett, Suozzi and Mollen, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MATTER OF SINICROPI v. STATE FARM INS. CO
(Jan 31, 1977)