Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

MARTIN v. THE STATE.

BELL, Chief Judge.

Defendant was convicted of aggravated sodomy. Held:

1. No objection was made at trial to the in-court identification of defendant. Absent an objection, defendant will not be heard to complain on appeal that this in-court identification was tainted by prior improper out-of-court identification procedures. Johnson v. State, 128 Ga. App. 69 (1) ( 195 S.E.2d 676).

2. There is no merit in the contention that defendant was denied due process on the ground that the state knowingly used the perjured testimony of the victim.

3. The evidence authorized the conviction.

Judgment affirmed. McMurray and Smith, JJ., concur.

SUBMITTED JANUARY 19, 1977 — DECIDED FEBRUARY 2, 1977.
Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MARTIN v. STATE
(Feb 2, 1977)