Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates
Judges

DOWNS v. THE STATE.

BELL, Chief Judge.

Defendant was convicted of the abandonment of an illegitimate child. A motion for a new trial on grounds of newly discovered evidence was filed. The defendant submitted an affidavit of an acquaintance of both the prosecutrix and the defendant in which it was averred that the prosecutrix had accused other men of the paternity of the child. The motion was denied. Held:

There was no showing that this evidence could not have been discovered by the exercise of ordinary diligence. The mere allegation that the evidence could not have been discovered by ordinary diligence is insufficient. Mills v. State, 193 Ga. 139 ( 17 S.E.2d 719). Secondly, the evidence was purely impeaching in character which will not authorize a new trial. Code § 70-204.

Judgment affirmed. McMurray and Smith, JJ., concur.

SUBMITTED JANUARY 17, 1977 — DECIDED FEBRUARY 2, 1977.
Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

DOWNS v. STATE
(Feb 2, 1977)