Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

The STATE Respondent, v. Frank MIDDLETON, Appellant.

February 9, 1977.

Per Curiam:

On October 4, 1976, the Supreme Court of the United States entered an order granting the appellant's petition for a writ of certiorari and vacated the judgment of this Court affirming the appellant's conviction. See State v. Middleton, 266 S.C. 251, 222 S.E.2d 763 (1976). The Supreme Court of the United States remanded for further consideration in light of Doyle and Wood v. Ohio, 426 U.S. 610, 96 S.Ct. 2240, 49 L.Ed.2d 91 (1976).

We conclude that Doyle and Wood v. Ohio, supra, is inapposite to the instant case. Therefore, we reaffirm the conviction and sentence of Middleton.

Reaffirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

STATE v. MIDDLETON
(Feb 9, 1977)