Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

MITCHELL v. THE STATE.

GUNTER, Justice.

Appellant was convicted for the murder of her husband; she received a sentence of life imprisonment; and she has appealed.

Several eyewitnesses testified as to the shooting of the victim by the appellant. The appellant testified in her own behalf, and she contended that she had shot her husband out of fear because she thought that he would shoot her. The appellant has enumerated two errors in this court. Her first contention is that the trial court committed error in permitting a witness to testify as a surprise to the defense. Under the facts presented in this case, this contention is without merit. Sheats v. State, 237 Ga. 757 ( 229 S.E.2d 600) (1976).

Her second contention is that the trial court committed error and abused its discretion in failing to charge the jury on the lesser included offense of voluntary manslaughter when the evidence presented at trial warranted such a charge. Under the rules laid down in State v. Stonaker, 236 Ga. 1 ( 222 S.E.2d 354) (1976), this contention is without merit.

The judgment below must be affirmed. Judgment affirmed. All the Justices concur.

GUNTER, Justice.

SUBMITTED OCTOBER 29, 1976 — DECIDED FEBRUARY 14, 1977 — REHEARING DENIED MARCH 1, 1977.
Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MITCHELL v. STATE
(Feb 14, 1977)