AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

CITY OF LONG BEACH et al., Appellants, v. SERIL CORP. et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants.

In an action for a judgment declaring a certain certificate of occupancy to be null and void and to vacate the said certificate, (1) defendants Seril Corp., Bela Friedman and Carmel Hotel appeal from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated September 24, 1975, as denied their application to dismiss the complaint as against them and for summary judgment and (2) plaintiffs cross-appeal from so much of the same order as denied their motion for summary judgment as against the appellants-respondents. Order affirmed, without costs or disbursements. On a prior appeal, appellants-respondents raised the same issue they now raise and it was rejected by this court (City of Long Beach v Seril Corp., 45 A.D.2d 707). That determination remains binding (see Powell v Trans-Auto Systems, 32 A.D.2d 650; Levitz v Robbins Music Corp., 17 A.D.2d 801). Plaintiffs, in their brief on this appeal, concede that there are triable issues of fact. Latham, Acting P.J., Margett, Suozzi and Mollen, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

CITY OF LONG BEACH v. SERIL CORP
(Feb 7, 1977)