Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

WHITENER v. WHITENER et al.

PER CURIAM.

This appeal is from an order finding appellant in contempt of a temporary decree in a divorce action. The decree provided that appellant satisfy a delinquent 120 day note and security deed upon the parties' residence, which had been temporarily awarded to appellee-wife as her abode, in order to prevent foreclosure. Appellant failed to comply and the property was sold at foreclosure sale. We affirm. The evidence is sufficient to support the trial court's order. Also we find the provisions for purging the contempt were reasonable under the facts of this case. Findings of fact and conclusions of law were not required. Hines v. Hines, 237 Ga. 755 ( 229 S.E.2d 744) (1976).

Judgment affirmed. All the Justices concur.

PER CURIAM.

SUBMITTED FEBRUARY 16, 1977 — DECIDED MARCH 2, 1977 — REHEARING DENIED MARCH 17, 1977.
Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

WHITENER v. WHITENER
(Mar 2, 1977)