Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

IN THE MATTER OF THE ADOPTION OF J BY J AND A.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the Appellate Division is reversed and the judgment of the Essex County Court is reinstated substantially for the reasons expressed in the dissenting opinion of Judge Crahay, reported at 139 N.J. Super. 533.

Headnote taken from dissenting opinion of Judge Crahay reported at 354 A.2d 668.

Three members of the Court would affirm the judgment substantially for the reasons expressed in the majority opinion of the Appellate Division.

For reversal — Justices MOUNTAIN, SULLIVAN and CLIFFORD and Judge CONFORD — 4.

For affirmance — Chief Justice HUGHES and Justices PASHMAN and SCHREIBER — 3.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

IN RE ADOPTION OF J BY J AND A
(Mar 16, 1977)