Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

MOORE v. THE STATE.

QUILLIAN, Presiding Judge.

The defendant was charged with possession of untaxed spirits. He appeals from the denial of a motion to suppress the contraband, which he claims was illegally seized. A certificate for immediate review was obtained from the trial court and an appeal entered in the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court transferred the case to this court.

Because the trial court's order is not subject to direct review, this court would have jurisdiction only if the defendant complied with the requirements for interlocutory review set out in Code Ann. § 6-701 (a)2 (Ga. L. 1965, p. 18; 1968, pp. 1072, 1073; 1975, pp. 757, 758). Those requirements were not met in that neither appellate court granted permission for the appeal. Therefore, we are without jurisdiction to decide this appeal and it must be dismissed. Bank of Commerce v. Williams, 138 Ga. App. 666 ( 227 S.E.2d 95).

Appeal dismissed. Marshall and Shulman, JJ., concur.

ARGUED MARCH 7, 1977 — DECIDED MARCH 18, 1977.
Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MOORE v. STATE
(Mar 18, 1977)