Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania v. Joseph BORRIS, Appellant

HOFFMAN, Judge:

The lower court has certified the instant case to this Court on a controlling question of law, see Appellate Court Jurisdiction Act, July 31, 1970, P.L. 673, No. 223, art. V, § 501; 17 Pa.C.S.A. § 211.501(b): whether the Commonwealth has failed to bring appellant to trial within the period mandated by Rule 1100, Pa.R.Crim.P., 19 P.S. Appendix. We have resolved that issue today in favor of the appellants in Commonwealth v. Mancuso, 247 Pa. Super. 266, 372 A.2d 454 (filed March 31, 1977); see also Commonwealth v. Richey, 247 Pa. Super. 274, 372 A.2d 459 (filed March 31, 1977). The instant case arises out of the same litigation and involves identical facts. Based on our decision in Mancuso, therefore, we order the charges against appellant be dismissed with prejudice. Rule 1100(f).

VAN der VOORT, J., dissents.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

COM. v. BORRIS
(Mar 31, 1977)