AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

In the Matter of EUGENE F. CLAYTON, Respondent, v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1 OF THE TOWNS OF CONKLIN, BINGHAMTON, KIRKWOOD AND VESTAL, Appellant.

October 14, 1976 determination appealed from reversed and vacated, order of the Appellate Division brought up for review modified to the extent of reinstating the August 8, 1974 determination of appellant Board of Education as to all specifications and charges except Specification 7 of Charge II, and matter remitted to Supreme Court, Broome County, with directions to remand to the Board of Education for imposition of an appropriate penalty, and, as so modified, order affirmed, with costs to appellant. The record contains substantial evidence to support the finding of the board as to the reinstated specifications and charges (see Matter of Bott v Board of Educ., 41 N.Y.2d 265; Matter of Jerry v Board of Educ., 35 N.Y.2d 534).

Concur: Chief Judge BREITEL and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and COOKE.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MATTER OF CLAYTON v. BOARD OF EDUCATION
(Mar 31, 1977)