Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

SMITH v. THE STATE.

PER CURIAM.

The appellant was convicted of two murders upon which death sentences were imposed. Her conviction and sentences were affirmed on appeal. Smith v. State, 236 Ga. 12 ( 222 S.E.2d 308) (1976).

Appellant seeks to raise the "Private Slovik Syndrome." See Ross v. State, 238 Ga. 445 ( 233 S.E.2d 381).

As a petition for declaratory judgment, the appellant's suit is not maintainable for the reasons stated in Ross v. State, supra. As a motion for a second sentencing hearing filed in the criminal case which has heretofore been before this court on appeal, the trial court's order denying the motion is not a judgment or order within the meaning of Code Ann. § 6-701 which is appealable at this late date. Code Ann. § 6-803.

Judgment affirmed. Nichols, C. J., Undercofler, P. J., Jordan, Ingram, Hall and Hill, JJ., concur.

PER CURIAM.

ARGUED MARCH 22, 1977 — DECIDED APRIL 7, 1977 — REHEARING DENIED APRIL 21, 1977.
Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

SMITH v. STATE
(Apr 7, 1977)