Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

WILLIAMS v. WILHOIT.

WEBB, Judge.

This is a pro se appeal in a civil case in which it is difficult, if not impossible, to ascertain the legal issues sought to be raised, and in which no authority is cited and no pagination reference to the 3-inch record are made. Since this is a court for the correction of errors of law and none have affirmatively been made to appear by the record, we must presume the judgment to be correct. See Smith v. Forrester, 132 Ga. App. 426 (1) ( 208 S.E.2d 199) (1974).

Judgment affirmed. Deen, P. J., and Marshall, J., concur.

ARGUED APRIL 7, 1977 — DECIDED APRIL 13, 1977.
Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

WILLIAMS v. WILHOIT
(Apr 13, 1977)