Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

HENDRIX v. CLARE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION.

SMITH, Judge.

Appellant sued for payment of a commission allegedly due him by virtue of his arranging a sale of property owned by appellee. Appellant contends the granting of appellee's motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict was error. As we do not have before us a transcript of the evidence introduced on the trial, we must assume the court was correct in ruling that the evidence demanded the verdict for appellee. Greene v. McIntyre, 119 Ga. App. 296 ( 167 S.E.2d 203); Turner v. Watson, 139 Ga. App. 648 ( 229 S.E.2d 126). We affirm on that basis.

Judgment affirmed. Bell, C. J., and McMurray, J., concur.

SUBMITTED FEBRUARY 1, 1977 — DECIDED APRIL 14, 1977.
Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

HENDRIX v. CLARE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
(Apr 14, 1977)