Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

HARBIN LUMBER COMPANY, INC. v. FOWLER.

McMURRAY, Judge.

This appeal is from an order of the trial court dismissing plaintiff's complaint. It is quite clear the court considered defendant's motion to dismiss after hearing evidence, thus converting the motion into one for summary judgment (see Code Ann. § 81A-112 (b); CPA § 12; Ga. L. 1966, pp. 609, 622; 1967, pp. 226, 231; 1968, pp. 1104, 1106; 1972, pp. 689, 692, 693), although the record does not disclose whether or not there was notice and hearing as required giving all parties a reasonable opportunity to present all materials pertinent to the motion under Code Ann. § 81A-156 (CPA, § 56; Ga. L. 1966, pp. 609, 660; 1967, pp. 226, 238; 1975, pp. 757, 759). But no question as to this is involved on this appeal since no objection was made to the procedure.

The sole alleged error cannot be determined without reference to the evidence adduced at the hearing of defendant's motion. No transcript of the evidence was transmitted to this court and we have ascertained that no transcript has been filed in the trial court; consequently, in the absence of such transcript it must be presumed that the order of the trial court was authorized by the evidence. Smith v. Smith, 223 Ga. 795, 796 (2) ( 158 S.E.2d 679); Nichols v. Love, 227 Ga. 659, 660 (2) ( 182 S.E.2d 439); Frost v. Gasaway, 229 Ga. 354, 355 ( 190 S.E.2d 902); Marlow v. Tankersley, 230 Ga. 460, 461 ( 197 S.E.2d 709).

Judgment affirmed. Bell, C. J., and Smith, J., concur.

ARGUED APRIL 4, 1977 — DECIDED MAY 2, 1977.
Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

HARBIN LUMBER CO. v. FOWLER
(May 2, 1977)