Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania v. Johnny JAMES, Appellant (two cases)

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM.

The Court being equally divided, the judgments of sentence are affirmed.

EAGEN, C. J., and O'BRIEN and POMEROY, JJ., would affirm the judgments of sentence.

ROBERTS, NIX and MANDERINO, JJ., would reverse the judgments of sentence and grant a new trial.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

COMMONWEALTH v. JAMES
(Apr 28, 1977)